beetalk search

Talk: Motivation and emotion/Book/2017/Online dating inspiration and sex

Talk: Motivation and emotion/Book/2017/Online dating inspiration and sex

Articles

Remarks edit

Hi Georgia – you are hoped by me never mind, but we jumped in and included the code for hanging indent in your sources part. To include more sources in the formatting, simply place them in prior to the dual brackets that are curly the finish (). Hope your writing is certainly going well: )–MMMRH9416 (discuss contribs that are• 04:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! I noticed you didn’t have guide chapters added under “see also” at this time that you might find relevant to your topic so I went ahead and found you two chapters from 2014! Hope they assist! –U3133258 (discuss • contribs) 03:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 2.14PM 16 October 2017

Going casing edit

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is actually for lower-cased headings. For instance, usage:

Topic development feedback and review. The subject development is evaluated in line with the marking requirements.

Written feedback is prov starting a brand new area below and/or calling the reviewer. Topic development marks will later be available via Moodle. Keep an optical eye on Announcements. Keep in mind that markings derive from the thing that was available ahead of the date that is due whereas the remarks can also be centered on all product offered at time of supplying this feedback.

Title, sub-title, TOC edit

  1. Minimal at time of subject development datingmentor.org/beetalk-review distribution; is currently nearly correct – remove very first page term capitalisation – just capitalise the very first page associated with name and subtitle to match utilizing the book/wiki design

Consumer page edit

  1. Produced, but fundamental at time of distribution without any links
  2. Applied effectively

Social share edit

  1. None at time of subject development distribution
  2. 1 link that is good summary prov Section headings edit
  1. Remove bold from headings – make use of standard styles that are heading
  2. At period of distribution, not a lot of part development that is heading
  3. Predicated on present content, it’s not clear that the most effective appropriate emotional theories and research has been Key points edit
  1. None of note prov Image edit
  1. Included
  2. Too little read easily – cons recommendations edit
  1. None prov Resources edit

Image edits edit. Hey here, Hope you mange to finish over time!

Leia o resto deste post »